The presidential election is all but around now—“all but” for the reason that it was so definitely stolen that there is nevertheless a opportunity reality and justice will prevail, with Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) yesterday turning out to be the to start with senator to announce programs to object to congressional certification, which will power the Dwelling and Senate to vote on whether or not to uphold Biden’s contested victory in the Electoral College or university. The wokies are further than ecstatic, humming “Hail to the Chief” each time they feel of Joe Biden—or even Hunter Biden, China Joe’s son, beneath investigation by the Justice Section considering the fact that late 2018.
The woke media—a media also corrupt to print, in the course of the presidential marketing campaign, tales of the Biden family’s many years of corruption—was oh, so uninterested in the statistical disparities in voting that plainly indicated election fraud. They were being prepared to bear any stress, pay back any price tag, like the traducing of democracy, to get rid of Donald Trump.
Let us facial area it: absolutely everyone who pays interest to politics appreciates the election was stolen. Here’s how you can inform.
A 35-webpage report issued by Peter Navarro, assistant to the president, director of Trade and Manufacturing Plan, and national Protection Output Act policy coordinator, lists a range of statistical anomalies in the battleground states, which include substantial modifications in absentee ballot rejection charges from prior elections, and excessively substantial voter turnout (at moments exceeding 100 percent).
The Navarro report states that “in Nevada, the overall rejection fee dropped from 1.6% in 2016 to .58% in 2020. In Pennsylvania, the 2016 rejection fee of 1.% dropped to almost very little at .28%. The greatest tumble in the total absentee ballot rejection rate arrived, nevertheless, in Georgia. Its rejection amount fell from 6.8% in 2016 to a mere .34% in 2020.”
And the report claims, “In the 2020 race, Georgia election officers acquired 1,320,154 mail-in and absentee ballots. If these ballots had been turned down at the 2016 level of 6.8% as a substitute of the 2020 price of .34%, there would have been 81,321 ballots turned down in its place of the 4,489 ballots that have been actually rejected.
“Under the conservative assumption that 60% of these mail-in and absentee ballots went to Joe Biden, this extraordinary fall in the rejection level supplied Joe Biden with an further 16,264 votes. That’s far more than the margin of the alleged Biden victory in Ga.”
The Navarro report also says, “Cybersecurity executive and previous NASA analyst, Russ Ramsland, testified that in Wayne County, Michigan, the place Dominion Voting Methods products was utilised, 46 out of 47 precincts in the county displayed greater than a 96% voter turnout. 25 out of these precincts confirmed a 100% voter turnout.”
Ah, indeed, the wokies say, but these are just statistics. We did not see any precise evidence of fraud, and male can not live by studies alone. But in actuality, wokies have been dwelling by studies for decades. Glimpse at their statements of racial profiling by law enforcement and by housing loan companies.
Justice O’Connor may have presented birth to the statistical disparity small business in Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. (1989) when she wrote: “Where there is a significant statistical disparity concerning the quantity of certified minority contractors keen and capable to carry out a certain support and the selection of this sort of contractors truly engaged by the locality or the locality’s primary contractors, an inference of discriminatory exclusion could come up.”
It is been figures ever due to the fact.
A piece in the June 10, 2020, problem of The Washington Article states: “A New York Moments assessment soon after the loss of life of George Floyd discovered that while black people today make up 19 % of the Minneapolis inhabitants and 9 % of its police, they have been on the getting conclusion of 58 % of the city’s law enforcement use-of-pressure incidents.”
And the level is precisely—what? Presumably that we would be expecting in the vicinity of-precise racial proportionality in use-of-force incidents by law enforcement. Simply because the percentage of use-of-pressure incidents in opposition to blacks is a few times the share of blacks in the population, the law enforcement have to be discriminating by race.
In this article are two far more items from The Washington Publish piece:
- A research of prison scenarios from 1983 and 1993 observed that prosecutors in Philadelphia taken out 52 p.c of opportunity black jurors vs. only 23 % of nonblack jurors.
- Concerning 2003 and 2012, prosecutors in Caddo Parish, La.—one of the most intense dying penalty counties in the country—struck 46 percent of future black jurors with preemptory worries, vs. 15 percent of nonblacks.
In the first instance, black jurors were taken off 2.6 occasions as generally as whites. In the next case in point, black jurors had been struck three occasions as generally as whites. This, the wokies say, is crystal clear evidence of racism. They live by studies. .
Redlining was the observe, typical in the 1930s, of drawing lines around sure areas of towns in which loans would not be built to applicants. The exercise was directed largely towards blacks and European immigrants, in particular Jews. It was outlawed many years ago. But in a lot of spots, a piece in the Chicago Tribune claims, the legislation hasn’t designed much variance. An assessment, independently reviewed and confirmed by the Connected Push, according to the Chicago Tribune “showed black candidates were turned away at significantly better fees than whites in 48 cities, Latinos in 25, Asians in nine, and Indigenous Us citizens in 3.”
And what are we readers intended to conclude from that? That those people figures show discrimination? Possibly they do.
But if they do, the election figures supplied higher than and many others in the Navarro report verify that Donald Trump was elected president. And all people understands it.
Hail to the Main.
Daniel Oliver is Chairman of the Board of the Schooling and Research Institute and a Director of Pacific Study Institute for Community Policy in San Francisco. In addition to serving as Chairman of the Federal Trade Fee under President Reagan, Dr. Oliver was Executive Editor and subsequently Chairman of the Board of William F. Buckley Jr.’s Nationwide Review. E-mail him at [email protected].
